Jacob Zuma and the ANCYL Conspiracy

What u say about "not guity", not being the same as "innocent", is true. However, given the reasons Willem vd Merve offered in his judgement for finding that tWhat u say about "not guilty", not being the same as "innocent", is true. However, given the reasons Willem vd Merwe offered in his judgement for finding that the prosecution had not dispensed their burden of proof, he may as well have said the "Kwezi" was lying. 1.) He said it was unlikely that Zuma would risk raping women with his daughter and a policemen near by. 2.) He allowed the complainants’ sexual history to be brought into evidence, which showed that her previous allegations of rape were considered. (Without, I may add, giving her an opportunity to respond to HER accusers.) 3.) The judge refused to consider prosecutions psychologist’s report on the complainant, which said that she had symptoms consistent with a rape victim. 4.) The judge’s statement that other women making rape allegations “would be treated differently because they are different,” implies that this women wasn’t a victim at all. The Judge in the way he expressed his judgement, did not only find Zuma “not guilty”, but tacitly found “Kwezi” guilty! This is a huge problem with the courts. “kwezi” was not given the opportunity under the law to respond to the defence witnesses who accused her of being a serial rape accuser, nor should she have to defend herself… Under the law, I don’t believe that Judge vd Merwe could have made a finding any other way. This is a problem with the law and the way the system unfortunately works. he poscecution had not dispenced their burden of proof, he may as well have said the "Kwezi" was lying. 1.) He said it was unlikely that Zuma would risk raping a women with his daughter adn a policement near by. 2.)He allowed the complainents sexual history to be brought into evidence, which showed that her previous allegations of rape were considered. (without, i may add, giving her an opportunity to respond to HER accusers.) 3.)The judge found that the pocecutions phycologist's report